<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Industrial farming = &lt; nutrition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stumptuous.com/industrial-farming-means-less-nutrition/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stumptuous.com/industrial-farming-means-less-nutrition</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:03:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: beforewisdom</title>
		<link>http://www.stumptuous.com/industrial-farming-means-less-nutrition/comment-page-1#comment-1320</link>
		<dc:creator>beforewisdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stumptuous.com/?p=3444#comment-1320</guid>
		<description>Most nutrition software and web site use the USDA database.  I wonder how old that database is and how much lower the nutrition is in actual food.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most nutrition software and web site use the USDA database.  I wonder how old that database is and how much lower the nutrition is in actual food.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt S</title>
		<link>http://www.stumptuous.com/industrial-farming-means-less-nutrition/comment-page-1#comment-1318</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stumptuous.com/?p=3444#comment-1318</guid>
		<description>I find this really interesting.

I&#039;ve always had a pet theory that in the past, less food yielded far more nutrients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this really interesting.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always had a pet theory that in the past, less food yielded far more nutrients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trishy</title>
		<link>http://www.stumptuous.com/industrial-farming-means-less-nutrition/comment-page-1#comment-1317</link>
		<dc:creator>Trishy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stumptuous.com/?p=3444#comment-1317</guid>
		<description>Interesting results, but since it was a news article and not an op-ed piece, I wish it was written in a way that excluded the author&#039;s opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting results, but since it was a news article and not an op-ed piece, I wish it was written in a way that excluded the author&#8217;s opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://www.stumptuous.com/industrial-farming-means-less-nutrition/comment-page-1#comment-1315</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stumptuous.com/?p=3444#comment-1315</guid>
		<description>I have seen more and more of these studies that show that nutrients in large farmed foods are lower than wild or organically grown ones (especially if the crops are rotated).

Yet another reason to eat local whenever possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen more and more of these studies that show that nutrients in large farmed foods are lower than wild or organically grown ones (especially if the crops are rotated).</p>
<p>Yet another reason to eat local whenever possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

