|
Terry, Jennifer, and Melodie Calvert, eds. Processed Lives: Gender and Technology in Everyday Life. New York: Routledge, 1997.
Jennifer Terry and Melodie Calvert, "Introduction" Arguing that we live in a culture which is "not only structured but saturated by gender, Terry and Calvert explore some of the general issues around gender and technology raised by this volume of work. Briefly touching on the asymmetrical binarism of gender and technology left by positivist philosophies of science and technology, they develop a picture of technology as "always encompassing relationships and exchanges among machines, designers, and users…contrary to a kind of technological determinism."(p.3) Terry and Calvert note that this nuanced analysis of technology necessitates ethical and moral implications for technology use, and an understanding of technologies within their particular historical, economic, and social context of design, realization, and use. Technologies are "always already" part of social relations (and it could be argued that technologies are social relations), rather than neutral objects which come to have social relations laid over top of them. Terry and Calvert identify four theoretical outcomes of using this paradigm. First, it allows us to ask "why" questions and receive sophisticated answers; why did humans develop x technology within y context? Second, understanding the human-machine interface as a relational process frees us from technological determinism, and shows us that technology can take on uses and properties unintended by its creators (see, for example, Frissen's study on telephone use). Third, this allows us to develop a history of technologies: their sometimes contradictory and ambivalent design, uses and artefacts which act as part of a network of relations. Fourth, which builds on the third point, technologies are part of systems of structural relations, such that they do not just randomly operate as neutral actors in networks, but are rather "an integrated system of programmed structures, organized mechanisms of management and control, and processes of production and reproduction."(p.5) In this sense, gender can also be thought of as a technology, in that it is a system and process of structures, relations, and effects.
Margaret Morse, "Virtually Female: Body and Code" In this article, Morse examines cyberspace to observe how notions of femininity and "the feminine" remain inscribed on new technological relations. She notes the profound ambivalence experienced in willing oneself to engage with technology while trying to remain within limits of culturally circumscribed femininity. Despite prophecies of virtual erasure of gender, Morse proposes that in fact, without the messy concrete presence of possibly transgressive bodies, gender stereotypes are even easier to promote online; extreme gender polarities are produced and performed (see Herring on gendered discourse online). Some have proposed that cyberspace is itself masculine in its desire to control the virtual environment (however, one could just as easily code it as feminine in its plurality, fluidity, indeterminate boundaries, etc.). Thus the question becomes: "What is the contemporary situation for volitional action and intervention?"(p.29) In one sense, this new technology offers more plasticity than many which have gone before it; in another sense this technology is always already under control, limited as it is by access, skill, and opportunity. However, suggests Morse, "a network is defined as much by its holes or what it leaves out as its links."(p.29) She outlines her work with activist women in the arts, who share acts of boundary crossing "to create new domains that include technological have-nots."(p.31)
Christine Tamblyn, "Remote Control: The Electronic Transference" In this article, Tamblyn briefly explores notions of "producing oneself" in the context of cyberspace. In the context of technological capitalism which operates under the rubric of "choice", "[p]roduce yourself is the new imperative."(p.42) The internet caters to the creation and proliferation of utopian fantasies about self-transcendence and re-creation (see, for example, Turkle), which, although mediated through aforementioned capitalist channels, may nevertheless remove the need to choose a singular self (although given feminist cautions about the very real effects of embodiment, this is a claim of which we should be suspicious). Tamblyn shares some of this reticence, noting the potential of us to "trade in our subjectivities for exquisitely simulated projections."(p.43) The body here becomes reduced "a command/control device transposed into written code."(p.44) Recalling Franklin's thoughts on the disciplining of the capitalist technological subject, Tamblyn states that "[t]he proper user in a mechanized culture must be trained, not educated."(p.44) The Web provides us with an example of how beaurocratic control simply shifts and adapts to take account of new technologies; for this reason we should be alert to implications for celebrating the virtual self. Tamblyn evokes Deleuze's figuration of affective bodies, arguing (incorrectly, I think, given Ahmed and Braidotti's concerns) that "bodies are not primarily defined by functions, organs, symptoms or genders…we should look not to identity politics or identities as possessions or attributes of bodies, but rather to the relay of affects on and between bodies."(p.45) While I understand Tamblyn's concern about biological essentialism here, I am uncomfortable with her reduction of embodied selves to the free play of desires, since she herself notes that "our identities are delimited by the poverty of our imaginations as much as by the abject biological markers of the organic." (p.45) If we are currently limited by the parsimoniousness of our intellect, how then does this represent a viable alternative for the here and now? Stone raises this concern in the context of designers reproducing the status quo despite a world of possibilities at their fingertips.
Nina Wakeford, "Networking Women and Grrrls With Information/Communication Technology: Surfing Tales of the World Wide Web" In this chapter, Wakeford explores women's online networks, and feminist interventions into the technology. She argues that constructing a discourse of gender as a priori problematic in relation to technology results in two significant difficulties: first, that the discourse of "problems" conceals the variable, contradictory, and often positive relationship that women have historically had with technology; and second, that "cyberspace" is not a coherent entity but a series of interrelated processes, practices, and things. Wakeford is concerned with rejecting the notion that "play" online is trivial, and not worthy of "serious" feminist attention; such characterizations may inadvertently structure responses to technology as overwhelmingly problematic for women (see Cassell and Jenkins on this point). She cites a variety of examples of how metaphors are used to describe cyberspace: Miller takes up this point in relation to metaphors of "the frontier"; Plant uses a weaving metaphor, and Haraway speaks of the cyborg. Thus Wakeford's caution about which metaphors we use indicates the power of technological discourse to shape our perceptions and resulting practices. In addition, Wakeford is careful to indicate the need for "a more radical reconfiguration of the relationship of (woman/)woman/machine, rather than solely concentrating on man/woman/machine…"(p.63)
Andrea Slane, "Romancing the System: Women, Narrative Film, and the Sexuality of Computers" In this article, Slane takes a rather unusual perspective on gender, culture and technology: an examination of the discursive presence of computers in film, arguing that "[t]he history of the depiction of computers in narrative films centrally reflects (or helps construct) the imaginary place of computers in American visions of power, individual freedom, and democracy—concepts which, despite their appeal to universal humanism, continue to be gendered in substantial ways."(p.72) Most films, according to Slane, do not challenge traditional gender binaries in their use of technology, nor ideologies of women as inherently hostile to technological "progress". "By considering historical changes in the narrative roles computers have played, we can see how technologies might influence the narrative depiction of gendered conflicts—and the role historically variant constructions of gender have and are playing in the imaging of the social function of these devices."(p.72) Computers call up a variety of ideological associations: "progress", reason, faith in science to control and manage human existence. Reason and rationality are paradoxically represented as the solution to and cause of problems; in narrative film this is often translated into a gender conflict (which is resolved at the end through a heterosexual union). Despite the potential for new forms of technology to expand possibilities for identity construction, as Stone and Wakeford also note in a somewhat different way, "these films leave gender, race, and indeed heterosexuality unproblematized as social constructs."(p.77)
Sara Diamond, "Taylor's Way: Women, Cultures, and Technology" Diamond begins with the presumption that although there is nothing a priori transgressive or liberatory in new technologies in terms of gender, the design and social/cultural application of these technologies may allow new, potentially positive kinds of interactions and experiences. This is not to argue that cyberspace is "a feminine space of fluidity and undefined identity"(p.83); as Diamond cautions, gender is a significant organizer of lived technological relations. Furthermore, the apparent potential for information access and dispersal online may create a false sense of democracy and participation. In the context of the workplace, "[s]cientific rationalism and, specifically, the ideology of Taylorism continue to invade intellectual and cybernetic production…"(p.85) According to Diamond's reading of Taylor, his central thesis was that all labour can be quantified. See Franklin's treatment of prescriptive technology use, and the role of "externalities". Capitalism, again, proves remarkably flexible in its capacity to appropriate and produce commodities; symbolic exchange thus becomes a product. Thus technology has a dual role of expanding possibilities for both personal freedom and corporate control. Furthermore, within the lived relations of the workplace, "[n]etworked working women describe a virtual masquerade", in that their behaviour is both typically gendered and exceptional. See Edelman's and Salminen-Karlsson's treatment of this in the Berner anthology. Diamond indicates possible sites of resistance for unionized women confronting and working with technology in their workplaces.
Ira Livingston, "Indiscretions: Of Body, Gender, Technology" In this chapter, Livingston outlines a brief history of ideologies of the body to show how presently bodies are understood in terms of machines, with the two ideologies being mutually constitutive. Ideologies of postmodern flexible bodies intersect with ideologies of machines which are no longer clunky piles of gears, but rather reconfigurable, multifunctional objects which are as much ether as metal. This relation of technology and the body disturbs both constructivist accounts wherein the body is infinitely malleable raw material, and essentialist accounts wherein the body is ontologically given. Livingston argues that theoretically, these two accounts are presented as uncomplicated "straw men so that the presenter can 'problematize' or 'complicate' or 'deconstruct' them, a maneuver that usually has the effect of re-installing the caricatures."(p.98) How then can we avoid replicating these theoretical relations? One suggestion Livingston makes is to consider sexual difference not just as operative between us but also among us, as a "fractal difference" which "divides us from ourselves as it does from others".(p.100) Moreover, "it is this contradiction between being always already constructed and continually under construction that now animates gendered bodies."(p.101) Virtual spheres provide opportunities both for expansion of identies and more rigorous surveillance.
Evelyn M. Hammonds, "New Technologies of Race" In this article, Hammonds argues that the concept of "race", both as a cultural and scientific notion, remains translated through terms of morphology, despite shifts in the meanings and manifestations of that morphology. Morphological understandings of race which posit "races" composed of discrete and identifiable physiological configurations are employed in ostensible boundary crossing through computer morphing programs. Under the pretense of fostering greater racial understanding, this use of the technology re-inscribes the omnipotent narrative power of elites, and elides real structural relations of inequality. The violent history of miscegenation is erased in seemingly egalitarian technological relations, and the right of white men to retain privileges of naming/encoding is re-affirmed.
Soheir Morsy, "Biotechnology and the Taming of Women's Bodies" In this article, Morsy argues that reproductive technologies, with their multiple effects predicated on relations of gender, race/ethnicity, nationalism, and power, represents a new form of colonialism of women's bodies. The international discourse on "population" and anti-fertility vaccines represents a desire by affluent industrialized countries to effect regimes of regulation and control on the nation-bodies of impoverished women. The fetishized body of the Other is a source of both pleasure and danger in its promise of exotic fecundity.
B. Ruby Rich, "The Party Line: Gender and Technology in the Home" In this highly autobiographical article, Rich details her experiences with the telephone as a site of subversion, pleasure, dis-ease and networking, and expands this model to suggest it as a possibility for technologically-driven forms of resistance, which paradoxically augments and limits communication. Locations are dispersed and ephemeral, which provides a site of multiple points of entry, but also "eviscerates" the possibilities of working from a single location. Furthermore, does pleasure in this technology use signify a "male" or "female" pleasure, since technology is traditionally gendered male, but communication female? What forms of technology would be really liberatory for women? "Imagine", writes Rich, "a truly interactive computer/telephone system that seeks to break women's isolation, replace the extended family with virtual communities, and enhance women's empowerment through strategic linkages."(p.229) Rich provides several examples, such as legal empowerment, online access to libraries, etc. As Wajcman also notes, the allocation of the domestic sphere to women has shaped their participation in technologies intended for home use, as well as the development of those technologies. How, then, to engage in resistance, and both commandeer existing technologies and demand new ones which more accurately address women's needs.
|